ArticleScientific reports2026
Exploratory proof-of-concept study and failure mode analysis of a dual-lumen stent graft for transapical off-pump LVAD implantation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transapical off-pump implantation of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) requires a separate inflow cannula and outflow graft. This study represents the first exploratory proof-of-concept evaluation of a dual-lumen stent graft designed to redirect blood from the left ventricle across the aortic valve into the ascending aorta while enabling LVAD support. The stent graft was tested in a mock circulatory loop, during wet-lab experiments on explanted porcine hearts, and in an exploratory acute large-animal study. In vitro testing showed no relevant impairment of pump performance. Wet-lab experiments confirmed that transapical positioning is feasible while revealing incomplete device expansion and myocardial tearing during balloon-assisted apical displacement. In vivo, a reinforced prototype could be positioned across the aortic valve, but myocardial compression impaired inflow expansion and LV unloading, while insufficient apical sealing resulted in bleeding and air embolism. Postmortem analysis confirmed correct device positioning without macroscopic valvular injury but identified myocardial tearing. These failure modes highlight the need for alternative design strategies for transapical off-pump LVAD implantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.