ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
Anticipating the hospital of the future: stakeholder perspectives on 6G technology requirements in health care.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe ongoing 6G standardization process is largely driven by technical advancements, but with limited consideration of sector-specific needs, particularly in health care. The current scientific literature primarily focuses on technical aspects, offering minimal empirical input from healthcare professionals, patient representatives, or medical device manufacturers. This neglects clinical acceptance and applicability as a critical factor in technology adoption. The objective of this study is to explore the hopes and concerns of healthcare stakeholders in the context of 6G standardization, to support improved alignment between technological development and clinical practice.
methodsTo address this gap, we conducted semi-structured interviews with key healthcare stakeholders in Germany and derived recommendations for technology providers.
resultsThe findings highlight insufficient interoperability, fragmented systems, and inadequate network coverage as central challenges in today's daily practice. Manual documentation and data transfers further burden staff under conditions of shortage and time pressure. A robust infrastructure, particularly in rural areas where telemedicine is growing, is considered essential. Concerns persist regarding data protection and security, alongside unresolved liability for automated systems and skepticism about increasing technological dependence. Nevertheless, stakeholders see substantial opportunities in 6G for simplifying workflows, enabling seamless device integration, and supporting use cases such as real-time imaging, remote monitoring, and cross-institutional data sharing.
conclusionThis study contributes to the 6G standardization by integrating the healthcare perspectives of medtech stakeholders and clinical end users, thereby supporting the development of patient-centered and clinically relevant communication solutions. The findings provide practical guidance for aligning future 6G solutions with real-world clinical requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42686928What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.