ArticleScientific reports2026
Evaluation of the relationship between sustainable and healthy eating behaviours, phytochemical index, anthropometric measurements, and depression in young adults.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was planned and conducted to evaluate the relationships among sustainable and healthy eating behaviours, the phytochemical index, anthropometric measurements, and depression in adults. A total of 400 participants aged 18-30 years were included in this cross-sectional study. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire comprising the Sustainable and Healthy Eating Behaviours Scale (SHEBS) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). A 24-hour dietary recall was used to calculate the Phytochemical Index. Anthropometric measurements, including weight, height, and circumferences of the waist, hip, and neck, were obtained using standardised procedures. There was no significant correlation among SHEBS, the phytochemical index, and BDI scores (p > 0.05). But the SHEBS scores of the 3rd and 4th quartiles of the phytochemical index were significantly different (p < 0.05). A negative relationship was also detected between the SHEBS score and body mass index, waist circumference, neck circumference, waist-hip ratio, and waist-height ratio (p < 0.05). The BDI score was found to be negatively correlated with waist circumference, neck circumference, and waist/height ratio (p < 0.05). In this study, sustainable healthy eating behaviour is associated with anthropometric measurements, but not with phytochemical index or depression. While healthy eating behaviours constitute an indispensable component of physical and mental health, their environmental effects and positive contributions to sustainability should not be ignored. Therefore, it is thought that more comprehensive studies investigating sustainable nutrition, phytochemical intake and depression are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.