SynthesisPediatric research2026
Floods and droughts and pediatric malnutrition in low-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed the prevalence and risk of child malnutrition following extreme weather events in low- and lower-middle-income countries.
methodsWe searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library for studies assessing child stunting, wasting, underweight, or overweight/obesity after extreme weather events. Random-effects models were used to pool prevalence and association estimates, with subgroup and sensitivity analyses by event type. Risk of bias was assessed using tools appropriate to study design.
resultsTwenty-six studies, including over 320,000 children met the inclusion criteria, focusing exclusively on floods and/or droughts; none addressed overweight/obesity. The pooled prevalence of stunting, wasting, and underweight following extreme weather events was 39% (95% CI: 31-48%), 19% (95% CI: 12-28%), and 42% (95% CI: 22-64%), respectively. Wasting prevalence was higher after droughts than floods (22% vs. 13%, p = 0.04), while stunting did not differ by event type (p = 0.68). Meta-analyses revealed no significant long-term association between extreme weather events and stunting, though a transient increase in risk was observed within three months of flood exposure.
conclusionsChild malnutrition remains highly prevalent in these settings. The complex climate-malnutrition link underscores the need for standardized exposure definitions and robust nutritional surveillance. IMPACT: This meta-analysis provides the first pooled prevalence estimates of wasting, stunting, and underweight after droughts and floods-19%, 39%, and 42%, respectively. Wasting was significantly higher following droughts than floods, suggesting possible climate- and geography-specific nutritional associations. Evidence linking extreme weather events to pediatric malnutrition in low- and lower-middle-income countries remains limited and inconsistent. Findings highlight major research gaps and the need for standardized definitions, baseline data, and climate-resilient nutrition strategies.
Identifiers
42686838What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.