Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42686800›Full record

Articlenpj health systems2026

A novel use of AI for prediction of clinical deterioration in a post-acute hospital.

Alexander Kauffman, Nataša Lazarević, Rahul Joshi, Jordan Pelc

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in npj health systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexander KauffmanDivision of Hospital Medicine, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Nataša LazarevićHuman Factors and Design, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Rahul JoshiDivision of Hospital Medicine, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jordan PelcDivision of Hospital Medicine, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada. jordan.pelc@sinaihealth.ca.

Funding

Sinai Health Division of Hospital Medicine internal student funding award, no grant IDSinai Health Science of Care Institute internal science competition funding, no grant ID
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing literature on the prediction of risk of deterioration in hospital settings, including by leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) models. However, this literature has focused on acute-care hospitals, rather than post-acute facilities, where the risk of deterioration remains high. Post-acute facilities tend to have lower digital maturity and poorer data foundations, as well as less rich physiologic data, making the implementation of AI tools for deterioration challenging. In this study, we demonstrate a novel use of AI for the prediction of clinical deterioration in a post-acute hospital. Despite clinical and technical barriers, we developed a meaningful predictive model (sensitivity = 82%). Further, the patterns of contribution to risk of deterioration from the primary contributing variables were remarkably physiologic. This demonstrates a novel model for the prediction of deterioration in an understudied context and provides novel evidence for physiologic predictors of deterioration consistent with previous acute-care scoring systems in the post-acute environment.

Identifiers

PMID42686800
PMCPMC13538516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.