Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42686794›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Resin does not safeguard insect DNA during early decay despite preservation of soft tissues.

David Peris, Anabela Cardoso, Bastian Mähler, Sabina Karačić, Josefa Cruz, Xavier Franch-Marro, David Martín, Enrique Peñalver, Mónica M Solórzano-Kraemer, Atahualpa S Kraemer and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

David PerisInstitut Botànic de Barcelona (IBB), CSIC-CMCNB, 08038, Barcelona, Spain. david.peris@ibb.csic.es.
Anabela CardosoInstitut Botànic de Barcelona (IBB), CSIC-CMCNB, 08038, Barcelona, Spain.
Bastian MählerSection Palaeontology, Bonn Institute of Organismic Biology (BIOB), University of Bonn, 53115, Bonn, Germany.
Sabina KaračićInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Josefa CruzInstitute of Evolutionary Biology (IBE), CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
Xavier Franch-MarroInstitute of Evolutionary Biology (IBE), CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
David MartínInstitute of Evolutionary Biology (IBE), CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
Enrique PeñalverMuseo Geominero, Instituto Geológico y Minero de España (IGME), CSIC, 46004, Valencia, Spain.
Mónica M Solórzano-KraemerSenckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseum, Frankfurt, 60325, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Atahualpa S KraemerDepartamento de Física, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510, Mexico City, Mexico.
Antonio Monleón-GetinoDepartment de Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), 08028, Barcelona, Spain.
Xavier DelclòsDepartament de Dinàmica de la Terra i de l'Oceà, Facultat de Ciències de la Terra, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), 08028, Barcelona, Spain.
Ricardo Pérez-de la FuenteOxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW, UK.
Alba Sánchez-GarcíaDepartament de Botànica i Geologia, Universitat de València, 46100, Burjassot, Spain.
Sergio Álvarez-ParraMuseo Geominero, Instituto Geológico y Minero de España (IGME), CSIC, 46004, Valencia, Spain.
Jörg U HammelInstitute of Materials Physics, Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon, 21502, Geesthacht, Germany.
H Jonas BarthelSection Palaeontology, Bonn Institute of Organismic Biology (BIOB), University of Bonn, 53115, Bonn, Germany.
Jesús Gómez-ZuritaInstitut Botànic de Barcelona (IBB), CSIC-CMCNB, 08038, Barcelona, Spain. j.gomez-zurita@csic.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The notion that plant resin acts as an exceptional preservative of insect DNA and soft tissues-functioning as a natural dehydration capsule-has been questioned in recent years, yet empirical support remains limited. We applied an actuotaphonomic approach across a 30-day time series to assess DNA and internal soft tissue preservation in two model species of insects, i.e., Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera) and Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera), under two treatments: embedding in fresh pine resin or remaining unembedded and air-dried. Total nucleic acid concentration, relative dsDNA, and quantitative PCR targeting insect and bacterial genes revealed a similar overall DNA decline through time, with no significant differences between treatments, although some resin-embedded replicates degraded faster. Synchrotron tomography showed taxon- and treatment-dependent soft tissue differences. Unembedded specimens of both orders displayed dried internal tissues after 30 days. Resin-embedded fruit flies largely retained intact muscle structure with minimal gas accumulation. Embedded red flour beetles, while maintaining tissue structure, were more poorly preserved, showing diffuse tissue boundaries and abundant gas likely from bacterial metabolism. These findings indicate that soft tissue preservation in pine resin is group-specific, possibly linked to exoskeletal permeability affecting moisture and resin exchange during decay, and suggest that recovering ancient DNA from amber fossil insects is highly improbable.

Indexed as

DNADrosophila melanogasterResins, PlantTriboliumAnimalsDNAResins, PlantActualismaDNAAmberPine resinqPCRSynchrotron imagingTaphonomy

Identifiers

PMID42686794
PMCPMC13538600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.