Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42685766›Full record

ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2026

Robust Bayesian hierarchical models for basket trials enabling joint evaluation of toxicity and efficacy.

Zhi Cao, Pavel Mozgunov, Haiyan Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhi CaoMRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0009-0004-6337-6280
Pavel MozgunovMRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6810-0284
Haiyan ZhengDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath - Claverton Down Campus, Bath, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3385-2117

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Basket trials have gained increasing attention for their efficiency, as multiple patient subgroups are evaluated simultaneously. Conducted basket trials focus primarily on establishing the early efficacy of a treatment, yet continued monitoring of toxicity is essential. In this article, we propose two Bayesian hierarchical models that enable bivariate analyses of toxicity and efficacy, while accounting for heterogeneity present in the treatment effects across patient subgroups. Specifically, one assumes the subgroup-specific toxicity and efficacy treatment effects, as a parameter vector, can be exchangeable or non-exchangeable; the other allows either the toxicity or efficacy parameters specific to the subgroups, to be exchangeable or non-exchangeable. The bivariate exchangeability and non-exchangeability distributions introduce a correlation parameter between treatment effects, while we stipulate a zero correlation when only toxicity or efficacy parameters are exchangeable. Simulation results show that our models perform robustly under different scenarios compared to the standard Bayesian hierarchical model and the stand-alone analyses, especially in producing higher power when the subgroup-specific effects are exchangeable in toxicity or efficacy only. When considerable correlation between the toxicity and efficacy effects exists, our methodology gives small error rates and greater power than alternatives that analyse toxicity and efficacy by parts.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicModels, StatisticalBayes TheoremComputer SimulationHumansTreatment Effect HeterogeneityTreatment OutcomeBivariate analysisborrowing strengthexchangeabilityphase IIrobustness

Identifiers

PMID42685766
PMCPMC13646420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.