ArticleJMIR medical informatics2026
Automatic Kidney Image Segmentation During Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Using a Deep Learning Model Based on a Multiannotator Dataset: Model Development and Validation Study.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAugmented reality (AR) has emerged as a promising tool to enhance surgical precision during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), particularly by enabling the intraoperative overlay of 3D anatomical models. However, real-time AR implementation requires robust image segmentation of anatomical structures, such as the kidney, which remains technically challenging in dynamic laparoscopic environments.
objectiveThis study aimed to develop and validate a large, annotated image dataset to train deep learning models for automated segmentation of the renal parenchyma during RAPN, as a prerequisite for real-time AR guidance.
methodsWe conducted a single-center, observational image annotation study using prospectively collected surgical videos from 131 RAPN procedures performed between 2022 and 2024. Patients had localized renal tumors, with 11 presenting with multifocal disease (160 tumors in total). A total of 48,000 frames were extracted based on image sharpness, diversity, and the exclusion of artifacts. A subset of 454 images was annotated by 9 contributors (surgeons, engineers, and nonexperts) after structured training. Interannotator agreement was assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and sensitivity against an expert reference. A convolutional neural network (AlbuNet-34) was trained using 12,546 annotated images and evaluated on a validation set of 3137 images. Model performance was analyzed overall and across surgical phases.
resultsAnnotators achieved high agreement, with median DSC values ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 and sensitivity consistently more than 0.89. The deep learning model achieved a mean DSC of 0.75 (SD 0.23) and a sensitivity of 0.71 (SD 0.24) on the validation set. Segmentation accuracy varied significantly across surgical phases, with lower performance observed during tumor resection and tumor bed reconstruction due to increased visual complexity.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates the feasibility of automated renal parenchyma segmentation using deep learning in real-world intraoperative settings. Although current performance remains below that of expert-level annotations, the creation of a large, annotated dataset and the implementation of a structured multiannotator workflow represent key milestones toward reliable AR-assisted surgery. Ongoing refinements in annotation quality, dataset diversity, and neural network optimization are expected to enhance future real-time AR applications in urology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.