ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026
Benchmarking methods for extracting microbial signal from host-dominated metatranscriptomes.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data originally generated for human transcriptome profiling are overwhelmingly dominated by host sequences, yet they often contain a small fraction of non-human reads that can be exploited for microbial detection. When such datasets are repurposed for secondary microbiome-oriented analyses, extracting and accurately classifying this weak microbial signal becomes technically challenging, and no ready-to-use pipeline currently exists. In this study, we evaluate computational strategies for filtering host reads and classifying microbial transcripts in host-dominated RNA sequencing data. We compare assembly-based approaches similar to those used in a previous study focusing on microbial translocation with state-of-the-art assembly-free methods, and assess their respective strengths and limitations using simulated datasets reflecting low microbial abundance. Our results show that assembly-based methods yield accurate taxonomic predictions but struggle at low read depth, whereas assembly-free methods are more robust in sparse settings at the cost of reduced precision. To leverage the complementarity of both approaches, we propose a hybrid pipeline that integrates assembly-based and assembly-free classification. On simulated data, this hybrid strategy improves microbial classification performance compared with either approach alone. Application to a real human metatranscriptomic dataset analyzed in a microbial translocation context illustrates the broader microbial signal captured by the hybrid approach, despite intrinsic challenges related to the absence of reliable ground truth and the risk of host read misclassification. Our work provides a framework for extracting microbial signals from host-dominated human metatranscriptomes, enabling the reuse of existing transcriptomic datasets for microbiome-related analyses, including but not limited to microbial translocation studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.