ArticleScience advances2026
Muscle coactivation-inspired stiffness-driven control strategy for antagonistic soft robots.
Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Soft robots excel at safe and adaptive interaction but are often constrained by limited load capacity and manipulation precision. Antagonistic soft actuators offer a promising route to address these challenges by coupling actuation with variable stiffness, inspired by biological systems such as elephant trunks and octopus tentacles. However, existing control strategies largely treat stiffness as a passive mechanical property, whereas those that incorporate stiffness regulation typically rely on analytical models, limiting their deployment in soft robots with difficult-to-model dynamics. Here, we introduce a muscle coactivation-inspired, data-driven control strategy that explicitly integrates motion control with stiffness modulation, enabling precise and robust control without reliance on analytical models or system-specific tuning. The robot requires only minutes of learning from simple motions to acquire diverse functionalities, including grasping, stiffness sensing, liquid pumping, and reconfigurable bridging. By explicitly harnessing stiffness regulation, this work establishes a general and scalable control paradigm that expands the functional scope of antagonistic soft robots beyond passive compliance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.