ArticlePloS one2026
Age-specific humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2: A comparative analysis of antibody levels in children and adults after vaccination with primary series or infection.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAge is a crucial factor in COVID-19 risk and severity, however its role in humoral immunity is unclear. This study compares associations between age and immune response following COVID-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection.
methodsData from the Arizona Healthcare, Emergency Response, and Other Essential Workers study (AZ-HEROES), a prospective cohort, were used to create two analytic groups: 1) a post-vaccination cohort including individuals who received two doses of the monovalent ancestral mRNA COVID-19 vaccine without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection; and 2) a post-infection cohort including unvaccinated individuals after primary infection. The analysis included data from September 2020 to April 2023. Children (<18 years) and adults (18 + years) were compared using linear regression, with immune response measured using log-transformed area under the curve (AUC) for receptor-binding domain (RBD) and spike protein subunit (S2). Finer age groups (<12, 12-17, 18-50, 50+) were also described. Adjusted models controlled for chronic conditions, medications, days since vaccination or infection, recent exposure to SARS-CoV-2 (post-vaccination only), strain type (post-infection only), and sociodemographic variables.
resultsThe post-vaccination analysis included 749 participants, while the post-infection analysis included 203 participants. Participants were predominantly non-Hispanic White adults, with median ages of 43 and 40 years in the post-vaccination and post-infection cohorts, respectively. Most reported no chronic conditions. In adjusted post-vaccination analysis, adults had 7% higher RBD AUC (95% CI: 1.01-1.13) and 20% higher S2 AUC (95% CI: 1.13, 1.28) than children, although these results were attenuated when restricted to individuals taking the BNT162b2 vaccine only. Post-infection, adults had 22% higher S2 AUC (95% CI: 1.05, 1.40), while RBD differences were not significant. By finer age breakdown, adolescents (12-17 years) had stronger responses than children younger than 12 post-vaccination, with 26% higher RBD AUC (95% CI: 1.13-1.40) and 29% higher S2 AUC (95% CI: 1.14-1.46).
conclusionsCOVID-19 immune responses differ between children and adults, with adolescents exhibiting stronger immune response to vaccination than children younger than 12, however vaccine dosage may play a role in this observed difference. Age-related differences after infection were limited to S2 antibody responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.