Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42685045›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Theodicy perspective as an effect of the interpenetration of mental and religious issues during the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland.

Grzegorz Adamczyk, Arkadiusz Jabłoński, Piotr T Nowakowski, Robert T Ptaszek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Grzegorz AdamczykInstitute of Sociology, Catholic University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7539-0686
Arkadiusz JabłońskiInstitute of Sociology, Catholic University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8081-2217
Piotr T NowakowskiInstitute of Pedagogy, Rzeszów University, Rzeszów, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1578-6707
Robert T PtaszekInstitute of Philosophy, Catholic University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper aims to answer the question regarding the extent to which the various types of COVID-19 pandemic experiences differentiated the intensity of religious attitudes among Poles. For this purpose, the validity of a working hypothesis derived from Niklas Luhmann's social systems theory was tested. According to this hypothesis, the interpenetration of mental and religious systems in times of a pandemic leads to the emergence of meanings that reorganise communication with other social systems. Thus, we sought empirical indicators of the strengthening of theodicy orientation within our respondents' mental and religious systems in correlation with the pandemic situation. The data obtained from the statistically representative sample of 2,312 adults who self-identified as believers were processed using four measurement scales, and the working hypothesis was verified through stepwise linear regression analysis. The results obtained indicate that the COVID-19 experience was a dominant variable in shaping religious behaviour, to the extent that demographic factors under pandemic conditions turned out to be statistically insignificant. The observed interpenetration of mental and social systems went beyond these differences, as it concerned the very foundations of communication in an environment that introduced serious disruptions in the information flow between social subsystems and humans.

Indexed as

COVID-19ReligionAdultFemaleHumansPandemicsPolandSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID42685045
PMCPMC13537611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.