ArticlePloS one2026
Technology-Assisted Rehabilitation Gym for at-home Training (TARGeT) for stroke survivors: A study protocol for evaluating feasibility, safety, usability, clinical benefit, and costs.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06406569 (Home RehabGym), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Home RehabGym: a Qualitative and Usability Evaluation of Advanced Technologies for Home Upper Limb Neurorehabilitation Post-stroke
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability, with more than half of survivors experiencing persistent upper limb impairments. Despite clear evidence that high-dose, repetitive, task-specific training is essential for motor recovery, many stroke survivors do not receive a sufficiently high therapy dose - particularly in the outpatient phase. Limited therapist availability, high care costs, and travel burdens remain key barriers to accessing rehabilitation training. While technology-assisted rehabilitation has emerged as a promising solution, most existing studies are limited to single-device interventions, are conducted in clinical settings, and/or require constant supervision, thereby restricting their scalability and impact. This study protocol presents the Technology-Assisted Rehabilitation Gym for at-home Training (TARGeT) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06406569), which aims to evaluate the feasibility, safety, usability, clinical benefits, and economic potential of a novel, unsupervised, high-dose home-based therapy program that integrates multiple complementary technologies for upper limb stroke rehabilitation. In this single-centre, pilot feasibility trial, up to 30 subacute and chronic stroke survivors will complete six weeks of daily home-based therapy using three complementary rehabilitation technologies that enable self-administered training without therapist supervision. The training will be remotely monitored by clinicians via an online platform that reports data on the training progress. Assessments will be conducted at five timepoints, measuring clinical outcomes (e.g., FMA, ARAT), quality of life, healthcare utilization, and technologies' perceived usability (SUS, RawTLX). The study will assess whether unsupervised, home-based multi-technology rehabilitation is feasible and safe, provides high usability and satisfying user experience, whether it yields clinical outcomes comparable to conventional therapy based on data from previous studies (own data and literature data), and determines the associated costs relative to conventional therapy. The TARGeT program addresses the critical gap in therapy access and intensity by delivering scalable, high-dose rehabilitation directly into patients' homes. Results will inform future trials and support broader adoption of decentralized, technology-enabled stroke rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.