Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42685026›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Coral restoration is only practical when local human pressure levels are low.

Cole Baird Brookson, Ariel Greiner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cole Baird BrooksonDepartment of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1237-4096
Ariel GreinerDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0471-8031

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coral reefs are threatened by interacting local (fishing, coastal development) and global (climate change) stressors that degrade coral cover and reduce overall reef biodiversity. Adding coral to the reef (coral restoration) is gaining prominence as a management strategy, however it is unclear whether restoration alone can ensure self-sustaining high coral cover (i.e., > 30% coral cover) under interacting stressors. We assess how much restoration is needed for a self-sustaining healthy coral reef using a mathematical model and real-world restoration case studies. We find that a reef with low macroalgal cover and high coral recruitment requires low levels of restoration to ensure self-sustaining high coral cover. As nutrient enrichment and fishing increase, more restoration is required to ensure self-sustaining high coral cover. Thus, if the reef is facing high local human stressors, restoration is unlikely to ensure self-sustaining high coral cover, suggesting that under such conditions conservation resources should first be allocated towards reducing the impact of stressors, prior to any restoration.

Indexed as

AnthozoaConservation of Natural ResourcesCoral ReefsAnimalsBiodiversityClimate ChangeHumansModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

PMID42685026
PMCPMC13537597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.