ArticlePLOS mental health2026
Social dysfunction in Ecuadorian, Peruvian, and Venezuelan media workers.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The personal, occupational and psychosocial risk and protection factors associated with social dysfunction in media workers are analyzed. A total of 314 workers were surveyed. Data were collected on personal and occupational variables, and scales were administered to assess coping styles, perceived loneliness, emotional impact of the health emergency, and social dysfunction, which was measured using Scale C of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28). It was found that 19.7% were at risk of social dysfunction. This risk was particularly evident among workers without a formal partner and those performing fieldwork in peripheral cities. Bivariate analyses indicated that workers at risk were more likely to be women, younger, less experienced, with limited training during the crisis, and reported poorer health, lower perceived ability to cover risky events, greater concern about infecting their families with COVID-19 or dying, and a stronger desire to quit their jobs. Psychosocially, they experienced greater emotional impact, higher levels of loneliness, greater use of self-blame and behavioral disengagement, and less use of active coping. The final logistic regression model correctly classified 89.8% of cases. Factors associated with increased odds of social dysfunction included desire to change jobs, perception that health would not improve, concern about infecting their families with COVID-19, hyperconnectivity, and use of planning. Factors associated with lower odds included working in the capital city, seeking emotional support, and employing humor. The importance of preventing social dysfunction to improve the mental health and general well-being of media workers in crisis contexts is discussed. In summary, the social dysfunction in media workers increases with personal or family affectation, the desire to change employment, hyperconnectivity, planning, and self-blame, and decreases among those who work in the capital, seek emotional support, and use humor.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.