ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2026
Evaluation of Mental Foramen Position and Morphology on Panoramic Radiographs.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The mental foramen (MF) is a key anatomical landmark in oral and maxillofacial surgery; its accurate localization is critical for preventing neurovascular complications. This study aimed to radiologically evaluate MF position, morphology, symmetry, and interforaminal distance using panoramic radiographs, with particular emphasis on clinical relevance in surgical planning. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective study included panoramic radiographs of 500 patients from the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Eskişehir Osmangazi University. MF position was classified into 6 categories based on relationship to adjacent teeth. Shape, symmetry, and interforaminal distance were also assessed. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software. RESULTS The most common MF position was at the level of the second premolar (position 4, 50.9%), followed by the area between the first and second premolars (position 3, 38.9%). A round shape was the most frequently observed morphology (40%), followed by irregular (34%) and oval (26%) forms. The MF was asymmetrically located in most cases (80.2%). The mean interforaminal distance was 51.95±7.08 mm. No statistically significant differences were observed among age groups (P=0.308); men exhibited significantly greater interforaminal distances than women (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Panoramic radiography is susceptible to positioning errors, magnification, and superposition artifacts; careful image acquisition and interpretation are thus essential for accurate evaluation of the MF. Although panoramic radiography can provide useful preliminary information, advanced imaging modalities may be required in complex cases. These findings may assist clinicians in improving surgical safety and reducing mental nerve injury risk during dental procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.