Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42684995›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2026

Evaluation of Mental Foramen Position and Morphology on Panoramic Radiographs.

Yasin Çağlar Koşar, Görkem Tekin, Gizem Çalışkan, Sena Özkırış Türedi, Seçil Çobanoğlu, Nesrin Saruhan Köse, Ömür Dereci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yasin Çağlar KoşarDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-7673-0347
Görkem TekinDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6572-2675
Gizem ÇalışkanDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-4944-0344
Sena Özkırış TürediDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey.ORCID 0009-0004-0107-4412
Seçil ÇobanoğluDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9233-4862
Nesrin Saruhan KöseDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-1160-4179
Ömür DereciDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-7867-7199

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND The mental foramen (MF) is a key anatomical landmark in oral and maxillofacial surgery; its accurate localization is critical for preventing neurovascular complications. This study aimed to radiologically evaluate MF position, morphology, symmetry, and interforaminal distance using panoramic radiographs, with particular emphasis on clinical relevance in surgical planning. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective study included panoramic radiographs of 500 patients from the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Eskişehir Osmangazi University. MF position was classified into 6 categories based on relationship to adjacent teeth. Shape, symmetry, and interforaminal distance were also assessed. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software. RESULTS The most common MF position was at the level of the second premolar (position 4, 50.9%), followed by the area between the first and second premolars (position 3, 38.9%). A round shape was the most frequently observed morphology (40%), followed by irregular (34%) and oval (26%) forms. The MF was asymmetrically located in most cases (80.2%). The mean interforaminal distance was 51.95±7.08 mm. No statistically significant differences were observed among age groups (P=0.308); men exhibited significantly greater interforaminal distances than women (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Panoramic radiography is susceptible to positioning errors, magnification, and superposition artifacts; careful image acquisition and interpretation are thus essential for accurate evaluation of the MF. Although panoramic radiography can provide useful preliminary information, advanced imaging modalities may be required in complex cases. These findings may assist clinicians in improving surgical safety and reducing mental nerve injury risk during dental procedures.

Indexed as

Mental ForamenRadiography, PanoramicAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMandibleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42684995
PMCPMC13548816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.