ArticlePloS one2026
Factors associated with academic-medicine faculty attrition before promotion to senior rank: A national-cohort study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWomen and certain groups remain underrepresented among academic-medicine faculty at senior ranks (associate professor or professor). Variables associated with attrition before promotion to senior rank remain understudied.
methodsThe Association of American Medical Colleges provided data for a national cohort of 129,860 U.S. MD-granting medical-school matriculants in academic years 1993-1994 through 2000-2001; the authors included graduates from 1997 through 2012, first appointed to full-time instructor or assistant professor between 2000 and 2020. Independent predictors of attrition before reaching senior rank (vs. retention, with or without promotion to senior rank) were identified using multivariable logistic regression analysis.
resultsOf 35,902 graduates appointed to instructor or assistant professor, 34,478 (96.0%) had complete data for analysis. Faculty were more likely to leave academic medicine before promotion to senior rank if they were female (vs. male), Asian, and underrepresented groups in medicine (each vs. White), had any (vs. no) debt, reported non-academic (vs. full-time faculty) career plans at graduation, were first appointed as instructor (vs. assistant professor), at institutions where tenure was unavailable (vs. not on tenure track), and in a Family Medicine or Psychiatry (vs. Medicine) department. Faculty were less likely to leave academic medicine before promotion to senior rank if they had at least one year (vs. no) research during residency, were first appointed at research-intensive (vs. non-research-intensive) institutions, in a Pediatrics or Surgery (vs. Medicine) department, and had received any (vs. no) research or other federal grants.
conclusionThis national-cohort study contributes new knowledge to the literature about variables independently associated with academic-medicine attrition before promotion to senior rank, many of which are amenable to intervention. Programs that can foster students' and trainees' interest in academic-medicine careers, reduce debt, and promote grant-writing skills might reduce attrition before reaching senior rank and increase academic-medicine workforce diversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.