Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42684987›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Ontogeny of dialects across chimpanzee vocalisations.

Kassandra Giragosian, Marina Davila-Ross, Derry Taylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kassandra GiragosianQueen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0311-9472
Marina Davila-RossUniversity of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.
Derry TaylorInstitute des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod, Lyon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dialects are a vocal signature of population membership. Early in human ontogeny, vocal behaviour is relatively similar across populations from an acoustic perspective. As ontogeny progresses, the difference between populations becomes larger. While research in recent decades has shown chimpanzees show population-specific vocal signatures, debates regarding the sources of this variation, namely whether it results from social, genetic, or ecological factors, continue. By studying the ontogeny of vocal dialects, we can gain new insights into the processes generating cross-population variation in vocal acoustics. In this study, we measured the acoustic characteristics of infant (N = 21) and juvenile (N = 10) chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) laughs (N = 4733), grunts (N = 3694), and whimpers (N = 2798) at Chimfunshi Wildlife Orphanage and Gombe National Park. Using permuted discriminant function analysis, we found that we could discriminate between sites for all call types, indicating the presence of dialects across the chimpanzee vocal repertoire. This pattern held for juveniles, but infant whimpers did not show site-specific vocal signatures. Furthermore, we could discriminate between sites significantly better for juveniles compared to infants. We discuss the different processes through which the presence of population-specific vocal signatures across the vocal repertoire from infancy may emerge and argue that the development of increasingly recognisable vocal dialects in ontogeny suggests a role for social and ecological factors in shaping chimpanzee vocal acoustics.

Indexed as

Pan troglodytesVocalization, AnimalAcousticsAnimalsFemaleMale

Identifiers

PMID42684987
PMCPMC13537595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.