ArticlePloS one2026
Ontogeny of dialects across chimpanzee vocalisations.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dialects are a vocal signature of population membership. Early in human ontogeny, vocal behaviour is relatively similar across populations from an acoustic perspective. As ontogeny progresses, the difference between populations becomes larger. While research in recent decades has shown chimpanzees show population-specific vocal signatures, debates regarding the sources of this variation, namely whether it results from social, genetic, or ecological factors, continue. By studying the ontogeny of vocal dialects, we can gain new insights into the processes generating cross-population variation in vocal acoustics. In this study, we measured the acoustic characteristics of infant (N = 21) and juvenile (N = 10) chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) laughs (N = 4733), grunts (N = 3694), and whimpers (N = 2798) at Chimfunshi Wildlife Orphanage and Gombe National Park. Using permuted discriminant function analysis, we found that we could discriminate between sites for all call types, indicating the presence of dialects across the chimpanzee vocal repertoire. This pattern held for juveniles, but infant whimpers did not show site-specific vocal signatures. Furthermore, we could discriminate between sites significantly better for juveniles compared to infants. We discuss the different processes through which the presence of population-specific vocal signatures across the vocal repertoire from infancy may emerge and argue that the development of increasingly recognisable vocal dialects in ontogeny suggests a role for social and ecological factors in shaping chimpanzee vocal acoustics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.