ArticleEFORT open reviews2026
Surgery of the tumors of the spine.
Article in EFORT open reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal tumors encompass a heterogeneous group of primary and metastatic lesions requiring individualized management strategies based on tumor biology, patient prognosis, and mechanical stability. Decision-making frameworks, such as NOMS, SINS, and Tokuhashi score, provide structured guidance for selecting metastatic patients for surgery and defining individualized treatment strategies. En bloc resection remains the gold standard for selected primary malignant tumors, whereas separation surgery combined with stereotactic radiosurgery represents the cornerstone of modern metastatic spine disease management. Minimally invasive techniques represent a paradigm shift toward less invasive, patient-tailored surgical strategies in spine oncology, complementing rather than replacing traditional open approaches. Future developments in robotics, ablation technologies, and biomaterials are expected to further refine surgical precision and expand treatment indications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.