Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42684829›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

Brain cognition gaps reveal associations with dopamine and factors related to brain health through artificial intelligence prediction of functional connectome.

Morteza Esmaeili, Erin Beate Bjørkeli, Robin Pedersen, Farshad Falahati, Jarkko Johansson, Kristin Nordin, Nina Karalija, Lars Bäckman, Lars Nyberg, Alireza Salami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Morteza EsmaeiliDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0686-3571
Erin Beate BjørkeliDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Robin PedersenWallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine (WCMM), Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4139-2461
Farshad FalahatiWallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine (WCMM), Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0851-4615
Jarkko JohanssonWallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine (WCMM), Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4501-4735
Kristin NordinAging Research Center, Karolinska Institute and Stockholm University, Solna, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4157-1638
Nina KaralijaDepartment of Diagnostics and Intervention, Diagnostic Radiology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Lars BäckmanAging Research Center, Karolinska Institute and Stockholm University, Solna, Sweden.
Lars NybergDepartment of Medical and Translational Biology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3367-1746
Alireza SalamiWallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine (WCMM), Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4675-8437

Funding

Helse Sør-Øst RHF 2018047Helse Sør-Øst RHF 2021023Karolinska Institutet StratNeuro grantSwedish Research Council 2021-02558Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine P20-0515
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key question in human neuroscience is to understand how individual differences in brain function relate to cognitive differences. However, the optimal condition of brain function to study between-person differences in cognition remains unclear. While many studies have developed objective biomarkers to accurately predict intelligence and general cognition, consensus on domain-specific markers has not yet emerged. Brain age has been proposed as a potential candidate, but recent research suggests that brain age offers minimal additional information on cognitive decline beyond what chronological age provides, prompting a shift toward approaches focused directly on cognitive prediction. Using a deep learning approach, we evaluated the predictive power of the functional connectome during various states (resting state, movie-watching, and n-back) on episodic memory and working memory performance. Our findings show that connectomes during tasks, especially during movie-watching, predict individual differences across cognitive domains, while resting state connectomes predict episodic memory meaningfully. Furthermore, individuals with a negative brain cognition gap (where brain predictions underestimate actual performance) exhibited lower physical activity and higher cardiovascular risk compared to those with a positive gap. This shows that knowledge of the brain cognition gap provides insights into factors contributing to cognitive resilience. Further, lower PET-derived measures of dopamine binding were linked to a greater brain cognition gap, mediated by regional functional variability. Together, our findings highlight the importance of brain state in connectome-based cognitive prediction and introduce the brain cognition gap as a potentially informative, dopamine-modulated marker of vulnerability to compromise brain function.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBrainCognitionConnectomeDopamineAdultFemaleHumansIntelligenceMaleMemory, EpisodicMemory, Short-TermPositron-Emission TomographyYoung AdultDopamineagingcognitive resiliencedeep neural networksexplainable artificial intelligencehumanneurosciencePETpositron emission tomographypredictive modeling

Identifiers

PMID42684829
PMCPMC13537765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.