ReviewJournal of prevention (2022)2026
A Scoping Review and Content Appraisal of Free Public Athlete Concussion Education Interventions.
Review in Journal of prevention (2022), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health education relies on matching a program to users' needs and preferences. Using programs aligned with expert recommendations may improve outcomes. The purpose of this study was to identify and assess free, public, concussion education programs for an athlete audience and provide context for users to select a program that fits their needs. We performed a rapid scoping review following JBI Methodology and Cochrane guidelines for programs published in English during the previous five years in PubMed or SportDiscus, or in grey literature. Education specifically for post-injury care and conference abstracts were excluded. We charted primary author/organization name, program name(s), date of publication or update, delivery method(s), option to provide a certificate of completion, and program content related to expert recommendations. The search identified 1,449 unique articles and programs, and after screening at the abstract and full-text levels, identified videos (N = 6), online modules (N = 4), in-person discussion guides (N = 3), or fact sheets (N = 2) that were created by 14 organizations published between October 2013 and April 2024. Six programs provided certificates of completion. Program content varied and no programs addressed all of the expert recommendations, but clear patterns emerged. The most common recommendations included were those specifically referred to as "content of concussion education for athletes", being honest about symptoms throughout recovery, and athletes' role in encouraging others to report a concussion. These findings identify programs to consider when selecting educational program(s), with different delivery methods and learning objectives. Future effectiveness-implementation research is needed to expand understanding of real-world applications and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42684638What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.