ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2026
Beyond Remission: Risk-Adapted Maintenance and Mechanism-Guided Salvage After CAR T-Cell Therapy for Multiple Myeloma.
Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundB-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy can induce deep responses in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, yet relapse remains frequent. Neither post-infusion maintenance nor salvage after CAR T-cell failure has an established standard. MAIN TEXT: This review synthesizes pivotal trials, real-world cohorts, and translational studies into a risk-adapted framework for longitudinal care. Relapse biology, target modulation, CAR T-cell persistence, immune reconstitution, measurable residual disease (MRD), and imaging are integrated to guide structured observation, time-limited maintenance, pre-emptive intervention, and salvage. Preventive treatment is defensible only when the estimated risk posed by residual disease exceeds the competing risks of infection, cytopenia, and delayed immune recovery. At relapse, treatment selection should begin with clinical tempo, disease compartment, contemporary expression of BCMA, G protein-coupled receptor class C group 5 member D (GPRC5D), and Fc receptor-homolog 5 (FcRH5), prior target pressure, and host immune fitness.
conclusionsStructured observation is appropriate for many patients with sustained MRD negativity, no extramedullary disease, and recovering immune function. Persistent or rising MRD, residual lesions, aggressive disease biology, or unfavorable CAR T-cell kinetics should prompt early trial referral rather than automatic chronic therapy. Salvage may involve BCMA retargeting, a switch to GPRC5D or FcRH5, conventional cytoreduction, radiotherapy, antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, or a second cellular platform. Future trials should assess progression-free survival together with infection-free survival, treatment-free interval, immune recovery, quality of life, and responsiveness to subsequent salvage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42684629What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.