ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2026
Phytoremediation-agrivoltaic systems for PTEs decontamination: a case study from an industrial site in Augusta, Italy.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past century, industrial activities have caused widespread soil contamination by potentially toxic elements (PTEs), making effective remediation increasingly urgent. Phytoremediation offers a sustainable strategy using selected plant species to remove, stabilize, or sequester pollutants. This study proposes an integrated agrivoltaic-phytoremediation framework for remediating PTE-contaminated soils. The framework integrates literature-based plant selection, photovoltaic system simulations, and techno-economic assessment, demonstrated through a representative case study in Augusta (Sicily, Italy). The effects of photovoltaic shading on C3 and C4 crops, together with PTE contamination, were estimated from literature data to quantify biomass reduction. A quantitative assessment was then performed by integrating literature data with PVsyst simulations of different photovoltaic configurations. The results indicate that the optimal configuration depends on the specific system objectives, such as maximizing energy production or biomass yield. Three agrivoltaic configurations, each combining a different photovoltaic technology with a selected plant species, were evaluated through a techno-economic assessment considering energy production, biomass yield under varying shading conditions, and net economic returns. The monofacial/Arundo donax L., bifacial/Chrysopogon zizanioides (L.) Roberty, and semi-transparent/Cannabis sativa L. configurations achieved annual energy productions of 568,660, 297,987, and 285,638 kWh, respectively, with corresponding biomass yields of 26.3, 60.0, and 14.0 t ha
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.