ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Predicting Craniospinal Surgery in Pediatric Achondroplasia: Benchmarking Statistical Inference and Explainable AI Under Rare-Disease Constraints.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo develop a framework that benchmarks penalized statistical inference against explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods for predicting cranial and spinal surgical need in pediatric achondroplasia under small-cohort, class-imbalanced, and phenotypically heterogeneous conditions.
methodsWe analyzed 34 clinical, demographic, and imaging variables in a multicenter cohort (four U.S. hospitals) of 150 pediatric patients with achondroplasia. We benchmarked penalized statistical inference (ridge regression and generalized additive models [GAMs]) against nine cost-sensitive classifiers, and applied post hoc SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to interpret the best-performing classifier.
resultsThe stacked ensemble achieved superior test-set performance (accuracy and macro-F1 = 0.77) with stable generalization and significantly higher discrimination than the GAM baseline (cranial AUROC 0.78 vs. 0.68; spinal AUROC 0.76 vs. 0.66). Calibration was acceptable, and decision curve analysis showed positive net benefit across relevant thresholds for both outcomes. SHAP highlighted class-specific drivers: foramen magnum (FM) stenosis, hydrocephalus, family history, frontal bossing, sleep disturbance, and age for cranial surgery, and spinal stenosis, Chiari malformation, family history, back pain, FM stenosis, and age for spinal surgery. SHAP dependence patterns suggested context-dependent age attributions in relation to FM or spinal stenosis, rather than a consistent standalone age effect. Several SHAP-highlighted predictors (e.g., sleep disturbance, back pain, and age) were nonsignificant in the inferential baselines. Kaplan-Meier curves indicated earlier intervention in high-risk phenotypes.
conclusionIn a reproducible dual-stream benchmark, XAI improved discrimination over conventional inference by capturing clinically contextualized, complex nonlinear predictive dependencies and interactions associated with cranial and spinal surgical risk in achondroplasia using preoperative variables.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42684595What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.