ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2026
Chemotherapy After Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Exposure in Advanced Gastric Cancer: Clinical Evidence and Treatment Sequencing in the ICI Era.
Review in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe incorporation of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) into first-line therapy has changed the treatment landscape of advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. This review summarizes the clinical evidence for chemotherapy after prior ICI exposure, discusses potential biological mechanisms, and considers practical treatment sequencing in the ICI era.
methodsWe conducted a targeted narrative review of PubMed/MEDLINE and major oncology congress proceedings through July 19, 2026. Original clinical studies reporting outcomes of systemic chemotherapy after prior ICI exposure in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer were prioritized, with selected evidence from other tumor types and mechanistic studies included for context.
resultsRetrospective and observational studies suggest that chemotherapy after anti-PD-1 therapy can retain clinically meaningful activity, although the evidence is heterogeneous and largely non-randomized. Taxane plus ramucirumab is the most extensively studied post-ICI regimen, but available data in the contemporary first-line-ICI setting do not establish superiority over other guideline-supported second-line options. Whether favorable outcomes reflect true immunologic chemosensitization, residual immune activation interacting with subsequent cytotoxic or anti-angiogenic therapy, or patient selection remains unresolved.
conclusionCurrent evidence supports individualized selection among guideline-recommended second-line regimens, including taxane plus ramucirumab, single-agent taxane, and irinotecan, after first-line fluoropyrimidine/platinum plus ICI. Prospective post-ICI validation and biomarker-integrated studies are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42684525What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.