ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2026
The Return of Thallium-201 for American Patients: History, Radiopharmaceutical Features, and Current Applications.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewAfter years of declining use of thallous chloride-201 (thallium) for myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), commercial production in the U.S ceased in 2022. Recognizing unique patient-care roles that thallium can serve, it was reintroduced in July 2026. A new generation of cardiologists has no or little familiarity with this radiopharmaceutical, and even many experienced nuclear cardiology practitioners are unfamiliar with its role to improve accuracy of cardiac amyloid radionuclide imaging with bone-avid tracers, gaps which this review aims to address. RECENT
findingsClaims data indicate that while thallium use progressively declined, during the last few years of its availability this appears to have plateaued, with approximately 5% of SPECT MPI studies in 2021 performed using thallium, reflecting a persistent albeit limited role. Updated radiation dosimetric modeling reveals the radiation effective dose of a thallium stress test, while higher than that of a technetium-99m study, to be less than previously appreciated, e.g. 3 mCi of thallium has an effective dose of 11.3 mSv, vs. 24.4 mSv using older dosimetry. For its novel application to amyloid diagnosis, dual isotope thallium localization/technetium-99m pyrophosphate amyloid imaging demonstrated improved diagnostic performance and interobserver reproducibility for detection of transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis compared to single-isotope amyloid imaging. Here we address thallium's history, from its 1975 introduction as a superior analog to potassium-43 and rubidium-81 for myocardial perfusion imaging, to its growth and then decline caused by radiation and image-quality concerns. We address thallium's distinguishing physical, chemical, pharmacological, and manufacturing features, and six use cases: viability testing where PET or MRI is not feasible or a poor option, simultaneous dual-isotope cardiac amyloid radionuclide imaging to improve diagnostic accuracy of SPECT, stress testing during technetium-99m shortages and in patients with poor-quality technetium-99m imaging due to subdiaphragmatic activity, rapid stress testing in patients with low radiation risk, such as the elderly and those with significant comorbidities, and potentially for SPECT stress myocardial blood-flow quantification. While the extent of thallium's readoption remains uncertain, its renewed availability diversifies diagnostic options for cardiac patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42684519What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.