SynthesisNeurosurgical review2026
Spinal intramedullary melanocytoma: systematic review & clinical management considerations.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal intramedullary melanocytoma (SIM) is an exceptionally rare benign melanocytic tumor of the central nervous system, with only a limited number of cases reported to date. Diagnosis is frequently delayed and relies on histopathological confirmation to differentiate SIM from other melanocytic lesions, including malignant melanoma. Owing to the rarity of this entity, its natural history, optimal management, and follow-up strategies remain insufficiently defined. We aimed to systematically synthesize the available evidence on clinical presentation, treatment strategies, and outcomes of SIM. A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed and Cochrane Library were searched up to April 15th, 2026 for reports of histologically confirmed SIM. Case reports and case series in English, French, and Spanish were included. Extracted data comprised demographics, tumor location, clinical presentation, treatment, extent of resection (EOR), adjuvant therapy, and outcomes. Descriptive statistics with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. An institutional illustrative case with 3-year follow-up is presented to complement the literature. Twenty-six publications comprising 35 patients were included. Mean age was 47 years and 40.0% were male. SIM most commonly involved the lower thoracic cord (68.8%). Sensory deficits (74.3%) and motor weakness (68.6%) were the predominant presenting symptoms. At long-term follow-up, neurological status was stable or improved in 84.0% of cases. Overall mortality was 17.1%; only 5.7% of deaths were directly attributable to local tumour progression. Recurrence occurred in 43.3% (13/30) during a mean follow-up of 28.1 months. Across resection groups, recurrence and long-term neurological outcome followed a graded pattern with extent of resection, but the trend test did not reach significance for recurrence (Cochran-Armitage trend test, p = 0.053) and was only of borderline significance for long-term outcome (p = 0.040); given the small, sparse subgroups these findings are hypothesis-generating. Although histologically benign, SIM carries a relevant risk of recurrence and neurological morbidity. Available evidence supports maximal safe resection as the primary treatment goal. Adjuvant radiotherapy may be considered after incomplete resection. Given the potential for delayed recurrence, structured and long-term MRI surveillance appears warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42684499What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.