ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology2026
Habitat rather than phylogeny may explain exoskeleton composition of three common land crabs from Christmas Island.
Article in Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Christmas Island in the Indian Ocean hosts large populations of land crabs, including the gecarcinids Gecarcoidea natalis and Tuerkayana celeste and the grapsid Geograpsis grayi. All three have transitioned into terrestrial habitats via marine environments, but through different evolutionary routes, and with different life history traits. These species provide an opportunity to investigate the incorporation of chitin, protein and minerals (particularly calcium and magnesium carbonates) into the arthropod exoskeleton given their shared terrestrial transition, but different evolutionary histories and contrasting habitat use. While these minerals are known to provide mechanical strength and resilience to external pressure, little is known of interspecific differences. If proportions are constrained by phylogeny we predict the gecarcinids would be more similar to one another than to the grapsid, but if there has been ecological specialisation this would not necessarily be the case. While there was more chitin present in the exoskeleton of the grapsid compared to the geocarcinids, no further significant differences in protein or mineral composition were detected. The [Ca
Indexed as
Identifiers
42684451What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.