ArticleUrolithiasis2026
Regional practice patterns and perceptions of ureteral stricture after ureteroscopy for ureteral stones: A survey study and expert recommendations.
Article in Urolithiasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ureteral stricture is a potentially serious complication following ureteroscopy (URS) for ureteral stones. In the absence of clear guideline recommendations, practices regarding risk factors, prevention, surveillance, and management remain heterogeneous. This study aimed to evaluate multinational urologists' perceptions and real-world practices related to post-URS ureteral strictures and to develop expert consensus recommendations. A multinational, web-based survey was distributed to practicing urologists worldwide through professional networks and platforms. The questionnaire assessed respondent demographics, URS case volume, perceived incidence and risk factors, preventive strategies, laser settings, postoperative surveillance, and management approaches. Data were analyzed using question-specific denominators. Expert consensus recommendations were developed through a structured Delphi process. A total of 362 urologists from 66 countries participated, with 80.1% performing > 50 URS procedures annually. Most respondents (56.0%) reported a low ureteral stricture incidence (1-2%), although 54.1% perceived an increasing trend. Only 39.0% consistently informed patients preoperatively about this risk. Prolonged stone impaction was identified as the most important risk factor, followed by surgeon experience. Most respondents (65.3%) believed pre-stenting reduces stricture risk. Postoperative imaging practices varied considerably, with 49.4% performing surveillance selectively in high-risk cases. Endoscopic treatment was perceived to have limited long-term success, with many patients ultimately requiring reconstructive surgery. Post-URS ureteral stricture remains an uncommon but clinically relevant complication influenced by procedural and surgeon-related factors. Considerable variability in practice highlights the need for standardized, evidence-based recommendations. The expert consensus developed in this study provides practical guidance to optimize patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42684444What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.