ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2026
Preoperative CT-based 3D analysis of middle colic vein anatomy for complete mesocolic excision in right-sided colon cancer: a retrospective cohort study from a prospective clinical trial.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeComplete mesocolic excision requires central mesenteric dissection near the middle colic vein (MCV) confluence, where anatomic variability may increase operative risk. However, MCV multiplicity, confluence patterns, and relationships to the middle colic artery (MCA) are not sufficiently defined.
methodsWe performed a retrospective secondary analysis of 300 consecutive three-dimensional vascular reconstructions from a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing surgery for right-sided colon cancer (age 65 ± 9 years; 59% female) between November 2017 and December 2022. We classified transverse mesocolic venous trunks operationally as MCV1, MCV2, and MCV3 according to their right-to-left position to standardize the description of multiple venous drainage patterns. MCV trunks (MCV1-3), their confluence patterns, and their spatial relationships to the MCA were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The reconstruction method had been previously validated intraoperatively and was performed by a single investigator.
resultsThe MCV was identified in all cases (397 veins total). There was one trunk in 68.7%, two in 30.3%, and three in 1.0% of patients. Confluences were most often into the superior mesenteric vein (65.7%), followed by the inferior mesenteric vein (12.6%) and gastrocolic trunk (9.8%). MCV1 drained mainly into the SMV (72.7%). MCV2 showed variable drainage into the SMV (45.7%), IMV (31.9%), jejunal vein (9.6%), left SMV (3.2%), and left colic angular vein (2.1%). MCV3 drained into the IMV in 66.7% and the left SMV in 33.3%. The MCV and MCA were separate in 67.0% of cases, with anterior crossing in 17.7% and posterior crossing in 15.3%. Left-sided drainage patterns were seen in 20-50% of patients with 2 trunks and 3.
conclusionsMCV anatomy is highly variable, with multiplicity in 31.3% and frequent alternative confluence pattern. Preoperative 3DCT can identify alternative variants and may support safer, tailored vascular ligation during lymphadenectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.