ReviewInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Postmortem Blood Procalcitonin (PCT) for identifying sepsis as a cause of death: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mapping two decades of forensic virtopsy: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis (2006-2025).International journal of legal medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of postmortem blood procalcitonin (PCT) in identifying sepsis as a cause of death through a systematic review and meta-analysis.
methodsA comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect and Cochrane library was performed. Studies evaluating postmortem PCT levels were included. Data were extracted from all studies for diagnostic accuracy parameters and study quality was assessed. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were estimated. Diagnostic accuracy was further evaluated using a Reitsma bivariate random-effects model and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) analysis.
result11 studies met the inclusion criteria, of which eight studies provided sufficient data for pooled analysis. Most studies used peripheral (femoral) blood, while some used different matrices such as pericardial fluid, cerebrospinal fluid, and aqueous humour. The pooled analysis of postmortem blood-based studies demonstrated a sensitivity of 91.0% (95% CI: 80.8-98.1) and a specificity of 94.9% (95% CI: 89.9-98.5). HSROC analysis demonstrated good diagnostic performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.937. Funnel plot interpretation was limited by the small number of included studies.
conclusionPostmortem blood PCT shows high diagnostic accuracy for identifying sepsis as a cause of death, with robust performance across variable postmortem intervals. Peripheral blood remained the preferred choice for sample collection. Despite assay heterogeneity and limited study numbers, PCT is a promising biomarker when correlated with autopsy, histopathology, and postmortem microbiology. Future studies should focus on standardized cut-offs, validation across different biological sample types, and further evaluation of its role in forensic diagnostic practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42684429What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.