ArticleJMIR medical informatics2026
A Conceptual Model for Ambient AI Adoption: Perspectives From Academia and Industry.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Unlabelled: Ambient AI technologies are increasingly marketed as solutions to reduce clinician burden and improve care efficiency; however, real-world performance varies widely across clinical settings. Health care provider organizations face challenges in determining which aspects of ambient AI performance matter most and how to obtain meaningful information about those aspects from vendors or through internal evaluation. This article presents a shared mental model to guide health system leaders in conceptualizing ambient AI performance across 3 interdependent dimensions: technical, interface, and system level. For each dimension, we outline the types of information relevant to assessment; what vendors should reasonably be expected to provide; and how health care provider organizations can conduct their own evaluations to contextualize, verify, or supplement vendor claims. By integrating both vendor and health system perspectives, this work offers a grounded, practical structure to support organizations of all sizes in understanding and making informed decisions about ambient AI technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.