ArticleJMIR nursing2026
Train-the-Trainer Evaluation of Technology-Enhanced Learning in Preservice Midwifery Education in Nigeria: Qualitative Descriptive Study.
Article in JMIR nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Midwifery education in Nigeria is undergoing a transformation in pedagogical approach. Existing traditional teaching materials are being supplemented by digital technology-enhanced learning resources; however, educators' limited pedagogical capacity may hinder their adoption. Thus, train-the-trainer (TTT) workshops were implemented to build capacity among midwifery educators to prepare them for the implementation of a digital learning platform across 20 institutions in Nigeria. Objective: This study aimed to describe the development and qualitative evaluation of a TTT program to support the implementation of a technology-enhanced learning platform within preservice midwifery education in Nigeria. We aimed to evaluate participants' perceptions of the training and their preparedness to implement their learning. Methods: The workshop was developed using the ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation) instructional design model. A 3-day TTT program was delivered in 2 cohorts in July 2025 to a purposive sample of 80 institution-nominated midwifery educators and information and communication technology officers from 20 pilot institutions. A qualitative descriptive study was conducted to explore participants' perceptions of the training and their readiness to implement and support the technology-enhanced learning platform within their institutions. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results: Pre-workshop responses demonstrated varying levels of prior exposure to and use of digital technologies, as well as differing expectations of the training. Four themes emerged from the post-workshop evaluation. Participants perceived improvements in their understanding of pedagogical and technology-enhanced learning approaches; reported greater readiness to support implementation and knowledge transfer within their institutions; highlighted infrastructure and technical support barriers to implementation; and emphasized the need for ongoing capacity building, monitoring, and support to promote long-term sustainability. Conclusions: Rather than evaluating educational outcomes, this study provides early evidence of educator readiness, implementation considerations, and sustainability requirements for technology-enhanced learning in preservice midwifery education in low-resourced settings such as Nigeria. A multifaceted approach combining capacity building, ongoing support, technical requirements, and institutional commitment to continuous improvement is needed. Future phases of this implementation research will evaluate educational, implementation, and institutional outcomes associated with the digital learning platform.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.