SynthesisNoise & health
Impact of Occupational Noise on Menstrual Disorders in Female Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Noise & health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOccupational noise exposure may impair female reproductive health, but evidence on its association with menstrual disorders remains limited.
objectiveThis systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the association between occupational noise exposure and menstrual disorders among female workers, providing evidence for future research and occupational health policy.
methodsPeer-reviewed studies published from January 1, 1995, to December 31, 2024, were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP. Eligible studies examined occupational noise exposure and menstrual disorders in female workers. Data on study characteristics, exposure assessment, diagnostic criteria, menstrual outcomes, and effect estimates were extracted. Study quality was assessed using tools for cross-sectional and cohort studies. Meta-analyses were performed using odds ratios (ORs) or risk ratios (RRs), as appropriate, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and subgroup analyses were conducted by study design, noise level, diagnostic criteria, and industry type.
resultsTwenty-two studies were included in the review, and 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis. All were conducted in China, mostly in textile-related settings. Occupational noise exposure was significantly associated with menstrual disorders among female workers (OR = 3.27, 95% CI: 2.50-4.29, P < 0.01), including dysmenorrhea (RR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.58-1.95), menstrual cycle irregularities (OR = 3.54, 95% CI: 2.54-4.94), abnormal menstrual duration (OR = 3.29, 95% CI: 1.65-6.59), and abnormal menstrual flow (OR = 2.52, 95% CI: 1.74-3.66). Higher noise levels, especially ≥90 dB(A), longer exposure duration, and nonsteady or impulsive noise may further increase risk. Substantial heterogeneity was observed.
conclusionOccupational noise exposure may increase the risk of menstrual disorders among female workers. However, evidence is limited by observational designs, heterogeneous exposure and diagnostic methods, inadequate control for confounders, and a concentration in Chinese textile-related settings. Prospective multicenter studies with standardized criteria, objective noise assessment, and rigorous adjustment for confounders are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.