ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026
Feasibility and Methodological Reflections From the Co-Creation of a Randomized Controlled Trial (The Kid's Trial): Decentralized, Child-Led Citizen-Science Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Limited public understanding of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) hinders recruitment, retention, and confidence in research. Early exposure to trial concepts may strengthen health literacy and research engagement. The Kid's Trial was a global, decentralized, child-led study that cocreated and conducted an RCT to help children understand trials and their importance and to improve critical thinking. Objective: This paper evaluated the feasibility and methodological implications of engaging children in the cocreation and conduct of a fully online RCT. Methods: The Kid's Trial ed a dedicated website guiding children through each step of designing and conducting an RCT. Materials were codeveloped with 2 patient and public involvement groups of children and parents. Any child aged 7-12 years could take part in as many steps as desired. Recruitment combined online and offline strategies, and engagement and self-reported learning were descriptively analyzed. The cocreated Randomized Evaluation of Sleeping With a Toy or Comfort Item (REST) trial was a 2-arm, pragmatic RCT comparing one week of sleeping with a comfort item versus without a comfort item. The primary outcome was sleep-related impairment, and the secondary outcome was overall sleep quality. Analyses followed an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach using mixed effects models adjusted for baseline measures. Results: Overall, 224 children participated in at least one step of The Kid's Trial. Participation varied: 37% (n=82) completed one step, and 21% (n=48) completed 6 surveys. The REST trial randomized 139 children, with 73% (n=101) completing outcome surveys. Adjusted mean differences (intervention - control) were -0.53 (95% CI -3.40 to 2.34) for sleep-related impairment ( Conclusions: The Kid's Trial demonstrates the feasibility of a decentralized, child-led RCT cocreated through participatory citizen-science methods. Children can meaningfully contribute to trial design and conduct, and experiential participation may support engagement with trial concepts. Future studies should enhance engagement through community partnerships, shorter intervals between steps, and embedded learning assessments to improve inclusivity and retention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.