Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42684185›Full record

Trial reportJMIR mHealth and uHealth2026

Self-Monitoring of Weight Loss Over Time: Secondary Data Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Renata Savian Colvero de Oliveira, Sharon Nabwire, Heta Merikallio, Markku J Savolainen, Janne Hukkanen, Harri Oinas-Kukkonen

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Renata Savian Colvero de OliveiraSoftware Engineering and Information Systems Unit, Oulu Advanced Research on Service and Information Systems, University of Oulu, Linnanmaa campus, Pentti Kaiteran katu 1, Oulu, 90570, Finland, 358 0442465690.ORCID 0000-0002-3042-2621
Sharon NabwireSoftware Engineering and Information Systems Unit, Oulu Advanced Research on Service and Information Systems, University of Oulu, Linnanmaa campus, Pentti Kaiteran katu 1, Oulu, 90570, Finland, 358 0442465690.ORCID 0009-0008-5960-6222
Heta MerikallioMedical Research Center Oulu, Research Unit of Biomedicine and Internal Medicine, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-0967-3987
Markku J SavolainenMedical Research Center Oulu, Research Unit of Biomedicine and Internal Medicine, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-2557-6423
Janne HukkanenMedical Research Center Oulu, Research Unit of Biomedicine and Internal Medicine, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-4981-0525
Harri Oinas-KukkonenSoftware Engineering and Information Systems Unit, Oulu Advanced Research on Service and Information Systems, University of Oulu, Linnanmaa campus, Pentti Kaiteran katu 1, Oulu, 90570, Finland, 358 0442465690.ORCID 0000-0002-1442-0562

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Behavior change support systems aim to shape, modify, or strengthen attitudes or behaviors without using coercion or deception. One of the main software features of persuasive system design is self-monitoring, which provides the means for users to continuously track their own performance or status, thereby facilitating goal attainment. Objective: The aim of this study is to examine whether self-input of weight (self-monitoring frequency) and its interaction with time influence weight loss in adults using a mobile health behavior change support system (mHBCSS). We hypothesized that higher self-monitoring frequency would be associated with greater weight loss, with effects varying across the intervention period. Methods: This secondary analysis used data from the intervention group of a randomized, open, waitlist-controlled trial in adults with obesity (BMI 30-40 kg/m²). Participants used the mHBCSS for 12 months, and analyses included only participants who maintained self-monitoring for at least 6 months (N=75). Weight changes were analyzed across 9 time periods. Quantile regression (QR) was applied to examine effects on the 25th, 50th (median), and 75th percentiles of weight loss. The models included self-monitoring frequency, time periods, and their interaction. A sensitivity analysis using a multiple imputation procedure was performed to assess the robustness of the QR. Results: The time period variable was significant at the 25th weight loss percentile (QR coefficient: -1.164, 95% CI -1.453 to -0.756) and at the 50th weight loss percentile (QR coefficient: -0.603, 95% CI -0.733 to -0.493). The interaction variable was significant at the 50th (QR coefficient: -0.018, 95% CI -0.047 to -0.003) and 75th (QR coefficient: -0.036, 95% CI -0.051 to -0.027) weight loss percentiles. Self-monitoring frequency alone was not statistically significant. Conclusions: The study demonstrates that the effect of self-monitoring on weight loss is time-dependent. While a higher frequency of self-monitoring is associated with greater weight loss early in the intervention, its influence decreases as time progresses. These findings emphasize the importance of sustained engagement with self-monitoring rather than focusing solely on frequency, suggesting that interventions should incorporate strategies to maintain consistent self-monitoring use throughout the behavior change process.

Indexed as

Self CareSelf-ManagementWeight LossAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesitySecondary Data AnalysisTime FactorsWeight Reduction Programsbehavior changehealth behaviorpersuasive systems designself-monitoringself-trackingweight loss

Identifiers

PMID42684185
PMCPMC13528884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.