ReviewJournal of periodontal & implant science2026
Association between periodontal disease severity and the risk of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: a systematic review and meta-analysis by the Korean Academy of Periodontology.
Review in Journal of periodontal & implant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis systematic review and meta-analysis quantitatively synthesized the available evidence on the association between periodontal disease (PD) and the risk of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). We also examined whether MRONJ risk varied according to PD severity among patients receiving antiresorptive or antiangiogenic therapy.
methodsMEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar were comprehensively searched for studies published through November 30, 2025, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Eligible studies were required to provide a reproducible definition of PD based on clinical, radiographic, guideline-based, or predefined administrative-code criteria. Studies relying on non-operationalized clinical labels without sufficient diagnostic detail were excluded. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed using log-transformed relative-effect estimates and their standard errors. To address heterogeneity in exposure definitions, studies were stratified into a severe/procedure-linked group and a moderate-to-mixed group.
resultsEight observational studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the quantitative synthesis. The primary meta-analysis showed a statistically significant association between PD and MRONJ, indicating that patients with PD had an approximately threefold higher risk of developing MRONJ than those without PD (pooled relative-effect estimate, 3.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.99-4.56). In subgroup analyses, the severe/procedure-linked group had a higher pooled relative-effect estimate (4.26; 95% CI, 1.96-9.24) than the moderate-to-mixed group (2.39; 95% CI, 1.45-3.94). However, the between-subgroup difference was not statistically significant; therefore, the subgroup findings should be interpreted as exploratory.
conclusionsCurrent evidence supports an association between PD and increased MRONJ risk in patients receiving antiresorptive or antiangiogenic therapy. Although the subgroup findings suggest that more advanced periodontal breakdown may be associated with greater risk, this severity-based pattern should be interpreted cautiously and confirmed in future studies with larger sample sizes and standardized diagnostic criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.