Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42683762›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2026

Gestational diabetes in multifetal versus singleton pregnancies: A multicenter cohort study.

Rinat Gabbay-Benziv, Esther Maor-Sagie, Amos Stern, Inna Bleicher, Simon Shenhav, Enav Yefet, Yifat Wiener, Michal Kovo, Maya Frank Wolf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rinat Gabbay-BenzivDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6887-6314
Esther Maor-SagieDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel.
Amos SternThe Rachel and Selim Benin School of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9091-9595
Inna BleicherThe Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0488-730X
Simon ShenhavDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Barzilai University Medical Center, Ashkelon, Israel.
Enav YefetDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tzafon Medical Center, Poriya, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3102-0739
Yifat WienerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Yitzhak Shamir Medical Center, Israel.
Michal KovoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Yitzhak Shamir Medical Center, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5443-5670
Maya Frank WolfThe Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar Ilan University, Safed, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2060-3234

Funding

Ministry of Health, State of Israel 0007955
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with increased neonatal morbidity in singleton pregnancies, but evidence in multifetal pregnancies is limited. Current diagnostic thresholds are largely extrapolated from singleton data; It remains unclear whether plurality modifies GDM-associated neonatal and long-term offspring outcomes. We wanted to evaluate neonatal complications and long-term offspring healthcare utilization associated with GDM in multifetal versus singleton pregnancies, and to assess effect modification by plurality and the impact of gestational age at delivery. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis multicenter retrospective cohort study utilized electronic medical records across six university-affiliated medical centers in Israel (1/1/2010-6/30/2024). All live births at 22 weeks' gestation or later or with birthweight of >500 g were included. Four exposure groups were defined by plurality and GDM status (ICD-9 code 648.8x): singleton without GDM, singleton with GDM, multifetal without GDM, and multifetal with GDM. Short-term neonatal complications (neonatal hypoglycemia, neonatal ICU admission, respiratory distress, intraventricular hemorrhage, and growth abnormalities) and long-term offspring outcomes were assessed by hospital-based health-care utilization (e.g., neurology, ophthalmology, cardiology). Multivariable Firth logistic and ordinary least squares regression models were adjusted for maternal age, body mass index, parity, and fertility treatment. Additional models adjusted for gestational age were performed. False discovery rate correction and GDM-by-plurality interaction terms were applied.

resultsOf 134 517 pregnancies (136 579 live-born offspring) to 104 023 mothers, 10 605 singleton (7.9%) and 256 multifetal (0.2%) pregnancies were complicated by GDM. In multifetal pregnancies, GDM was not associated with increased short-term neonatal complications nor with lower adjusted odds of neonatal hypoglycemia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.30; 95% CI: 0.18-0.49), neurologic (aOR, 0.37; 95% CI: 0.24-0.59), or ophthalmologic (aOR, 0.49; 95% CI: 0.31-0.77) health-care utilization. Adjustment for gestational age attenuated associations for neonatal intensive care unit admission but did not fully explain interactions for hypoglycemia or selected long-term outcomes. Conversely, GDM in singleton pregnancies was associated with increased neonatal morbidity.

conclusionsAssociations between GDM and neonatal and offspring outcomes differ by plurality. Risk stratification strategies derived from singleton pregnancies may not fully capture risk profiles in multifetal pregnancies.

Indexed as

gestational diabetes mellituslong‐term neurodevelopmentmaternal morbiditymultifetal pregnanciesneonatal outcomes

Identifiers

PMID42683762
PMCPMC13536459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.