ArticleSouth African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care2026
Maternal and perinatal outcomes after vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery versus second-stage caesarean delivery in a generalist-run rural district hospital: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVacuum-assisted vaginal deliveries (VADs) are recommended as safe alternatives to second-stage caesarean deliveries (SSCDs); however, little is known about their use and associated outcomes in South African rural district hospitals without obstetric specialist support.
methodsA 5-year retrospective cohort study was conducted at a rural district hospital in South Africa. Women who underwent a VAD attempt or SSCD in the second stage of labour were compared with respect to baseline sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and maternal and perinatal outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs).
resultsOf 7293 deliveries during the study period, 567 met inclusion criteria, including 417 VAD attempts and 150 SSCDs. Baseline characteristics were largely similar, with SSCDs more frequently performed in women with a previous caesarean delivery, for prolonged second stage of labour, and by community service medical officers. Vacuum-assisted delivery attempts were more commonly used for foetal distress and were associated with significantly shorter decision-to-delivery intervals ( 30 min in 79% vs 21%, p 0.01). After adjustment, VAD attempts were associated with reduced odds of postpartum haemorrhage (aOR 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15-0.60), with no significant difference in composite adverse maternal outcomes (aOR 0.64, 95% CI 0.39-1.05) or composite adverse perinatal outcomes (aOR 0.82, 95% CI 0.42-1.60).
conclusionIn this rural district hospital setting, VAD attempts performed by doctors without obstetric specialist support were associated with improved short-term maternal outcomes and equivalent perinatal outcomes compared with SSCDs.Contribution: These findings support the safe use of VAD in rural settings and highlight the potential contribution of family physicians and family medicine registrars to second-stage obstetric decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.