Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42683605›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

Distinct sensorimotor encoding in tuft dendrites and somata associated with action, correction, and learning.

Jackson Scheib, Zachary L Newman, Jacob Gable, Deano M Farinella, Mitchell Head, Savannah Bliese, Benjamin Dougen, Harishankar Jayakumar, Sarah Young, Nicole Miller and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jackson ScheibDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States.
Zachary L NewmanDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4336-6585
Jacob GableDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States.
Deano M FarinellaDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States.
Mitchell HeadDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7690-4610
Savannah BlieseDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States.
Benjamin DougenDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States.
Harishankar JayakumarDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States.
Sarah YoungDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States.
Nicole MillerDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States.
Robert Al KhouryDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States.
Huan Kim TranDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States.
Tien DinhDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States.
Aaron KerlinDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8257-5216

Funding

A dendritic nexus in the circuits that coordinate learningR01NS127902 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Aaron Michael Kerlin · 2023 to 2026
$1.5M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS127902NINDS NIH HHS R01NS127902Whitehall Foundation 2020-05-71
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frontal cortex plays critical roles in action control and motor skill learning. Within the layer 1 apical tuft dendrites of layer 5 (L5) neurons in the frontal cortex, precise input patterns and back-propagating action potentials can trigger powerful regenerative events that may be essential for flexible computation and learning. However, it remains unclear whether tuft activity in frontal cortical L5 circuits encodes sensorimotor information that differs from the information conveyed by their outputs to downstream targets. Using longitudinal two-photon calcium imaging, we investigated sensorimotor encoding in the apical tuft dendrites and somata of L5 extratelencephalic neurons in the frontal cortex of mice during learning of a discrete change to a cued dexterous action. During learning, movement errors either triggered corrective action or did not, allowing us to dissociate error signals from signals selective for corrective action. Somatic activity tracked both instructional cues and action, whereas tuft activity predominantly tracked instructional cues. Movement errors during learning revealed additional distinct tuft activity that was selectively associated with corrective actions. Furthermore, learning induced divergent changes in the response gain and net selectivity of tuft dendrites compared to somata. Our measurements uncover systematic differences between the tuft dendrites and somata in sensorimotor selectivity, sensitivity to corrective action, and functional plasticity, providing a foundation for investigating the contributions of dendritic computation to motor skill learning.

Indexed as

DendritesLearningNeuronsAction PotentialsAnimalsMicedendritesin vivomotor learningmouseneurosciencepremotor cortex

Identifiers

PMID42683605
PMCPMC13537764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.