SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026
Effectiveness of sexual health interventions in reducing risky sexual behaviors among people living with HIV: a network meta-analysis and systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Numerous sexual health interventions have been employed to promote safer sexual practices among people living with HIV (PLWH). However, their effectiveness remains uncertain. Objectives: This review aimed to assess and rank the effectiveness of different sexual health interventions targeting risky sexual behaviors in PLWH. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Elsevier, the Web of Science, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library for studies published between January 2010 and June 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included if they recruited PLWH aged ≥18 years and reported original quantitative data on condomless sex and multiple sexual partners across different groups. The network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted within a Bayesian framework. We used a random effects model to calculate odds ratios (ORs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) 2.0 tool, and the strength of the body of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Results: A total of 34 eligible trials involving 12,967 PLWH and covering four types of sexual health interventions were included. In total, six trials reported outcomes on multiple sexual partners, but no significant effects were observed. A total of 33 trials reporting condomless sex were included in the network meta-analysis. Goal-oriented interventions ranked highest, with surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values of 0.903 and 0.828. Compared to standard care, goal-oriented interventions (OR: 0.54, 95%CI: 0.39 to 0.76) and safe sex skills training (OR: 0.65, 95%CI: 0.43 to 0.99) significantly reduced the likelihood of engaging in condomless sex. However, only goal-oriented interventions showed statistically significant superiority over control conditions in most subgroup analyses, including those stratified by country income level, intervention format and delivery mode, recruitment setting, and participant type. Conclusion: This review highlights the effectiveness of goal-oriented interventions in substantially reducing condomless sexual behaviors among PLWH. Such interventions should be prioritized to address the persistently high prevalence of risky sexual behaviors in this population, with important implications for preventing potential HIV recombination and other sexually transmitted infection (STI) co-infections, thereby reducing the overall health burden in this vulnerable group. Systematic review registration: Identifier CRD42023414692.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.