ArticleJournal of surgical case reports2026
Technical considerations for minimally invasive resection and reconstruction of redundant sigmoid colon.
Article in Journal of surgical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dolichosigmoid is a recognized risk factor for sigmoid volvulus, particularly in elderly or bedridden patients. Although endoscopic decompression is the first-line treatment, recurrent cases require surgical resection. We report a laparoscopic-assisted sigmoidectomy using single-incision laparoscopic surgery and two-fire functional end-to-end anastomosis. A 3.5-4.0 cm transumbilical incision allowed laparoscopic inspection and exteriorization of the redundant sigmoid colon. Reconstruction was performed extracorporeally, enabling accurate determination of the anastomotic site and straight, tension-free bowel alignment. Post-reconstruction laparoscopic inspection confirmed a stable anastomosis without torsion or mesenteric tension. Although follow-up periods were short, all patients remained recurrence-free. This technique may reduce wound-related morbidity, facilitate early postoperative mobilization, improve intraoperative assessment, and reduce stapler-related costs. It represents a simple and reproducible surgical option for elective treatment of sigmoid volvulus in elderly or high-risk patients. Further accumulation of cases and long-term outcome evaluation are needed to establish its efficacy and durability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.