ReviewActa ortopedica brasileira2026
EVIDENCE-BASED REVIEW & RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY: REVERSE VERSUS ANATOMIC TOTAL ARTHROPLASTY FOR THE TREATMENT OF PRIMARY GLENOHUMERAL OSTEOARTHRITIS WITH AN INTACT ROTATOR CUFF IN PATIENTS AGED 70 YEARS OR OLDER.
Review in Acta ortopedica brasileira, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (ATSA) has long been indicated for the treatment of degenerative joint diseases in patients with an intact rotator cuff. However, age-related rotator cuff degeneration may negatively impact outcomes. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), initially indicated for cuff tear arthropathy, has progressively expanded its indications, including elderly patients with an intact rotator cuff. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Virtual Health Library databases up to November 2025, with the aim of comparing ATSA and RTSA regarding functional outcomes, complication rates, and the need for reoperation in patients aged 70 years or older with primary shoulder osteoarthritis and an intact rotator cuff. Results: Only one systematic review met the inclusion criteria, encompassing four observational studies, with a total of 2.731 arthroplasties. RTSA showed a lower reoperation rate compared with ATSA. Functional outcomes favored ATSA, although based on limited data. No statistically significant differences were observed between the techniques regarding complication rates. The overall quality of evidence was classified as very low. Conclusions: In patients aged 70 years or older with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis and an intact rotator cuff, RTSA is associated with a lower revision rate, whereas ATSA demonstrates superior functional outcomes, with similar complication rates between the two techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.