Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42683458›Full record

ReviewJournal of plankton research

Beyond the bottle: exposing the identity-rate gap in microzooplankton ecology.

Albert Calbet

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of plankton research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Albert CalbetInstitut de Ciències del Mar (ICM-CSIC), Department of Marine Biology and Oceanography, Passeig Marítim de la Barcelonta 37-49, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1069-212X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microzooplankton ecology was transformed by the dilution method, which made grazing measurable in natural plankton communities and established protistan grazers as major consumers of marine primary production. Four decades later, the field faces a different challenge. Automated imaging, metabarcoding, meta-omics and machine-learning tools increasingly resolve plankton identity, diversity and spatial structure, but grazer-resolved rates of ingestion, growth, prey selectivity, mortality and carbon transfer remain much harder to measure. This creates an identity-rate gap: community structure is becoming easier to describe than ecological function. The gap should not be reduced to a contrast between one classical method and modern identity tools; it reflects a broader difficulty of pairing organisms, prey, rates and environmental context within the same inference framework. Dilution experiments and related rate approaches remain indispensable, but their interpretation depends on assumptions about prey growth, grazer responses, nutrient limitation, mixoplankton behavior and bottle effects. Preserved samples also remain central to biomass estimates, although fixation and storage distort protists in taxon-specific ways. I argue that the next phase of microzooplankton ecology should not abandon classical incubations, but make them identity-aware, preservation-aware and model-facing through tiered datasets that separate bulk prey mortality, prey-resolved rates, targeted grazer-prey links and model-facing trait constraints.

Indexed as

dilution techniquegrazingmicrozooplanktonpreservationtrait-based ecology

Identifiers

PMID42683458
PMCPMC13533193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.