ReviewJournal of pain research2026
Risk-Stratified Monitoring After Image-Guided Intradiscal Procedures: A Narrative Review And Safety Framework for Interventional Pain Practice.
Review in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Provocative discography and intradiscal procedures, including intradiscal electrothermal therapy, cooled radiofrequency biacuplasty, coblation-based nucleoplasty, intradiscal pulsed radiofrequency, platelet-rich plasma, stem cell-based injections, and oxygen-ozone therapy, are increasingly used as image-guided interventions for selected patients with discogenic pain. Ultrasound-guided intradiscal access, particularly in the cervical spine, may improve real-time visualization of adjacent neurovascular and visceral structures during needle advancement. However, successful needle placement does not eliminate delayed complications after disc puncture, energy delivery, chemical modulation, or biologic injection. Objective: This narrative review synthesizes the mechanisms, clinical outcomes, complications, and temporal safety considerations of discography and intradiscal procedures and proposes a risk-stratified monitoring framework for image-guided pain practice. Methods: Representative evidence was summarized for provocative discography, intradiscal electrothermal therapy, cooled radiofrequency intradiscal biacuplasty, coblation-based nucleoplasty, intradiscal pulsed radiofrequency, intradiscal biologic injections, oxygen-ozone therapy, and ultrasound-guided intradiscal access. Emphasis was placed on patient selection, procedural mechanisms, imaging guidance, reported outcomes, complication timing, and discharge readiness. Results: Intradiscal procedures differ in diagnostic purpose, mechanism, tissue effect, evidence base, and risk profile. Higher-level evidence is available for selected thermal, biologic, and oxygen-ozone procedures, whereas ultrasound-guided cervical access and uncommon complications are supported mainly by small series, case reports, and technical notes. Early warning signs of neurologic injury, inflammatory flare, vascular injury, or hematoma may overlap with expected post-procedural pain; discitis more commonly becomes apparent after the initial observation window. Conclusion: Monitoring should be individualized rather than determined by outpatient labeling alone. After uncomplicated single-level diagnostic discography without sedation, discharge after approximately 1-2 hours may be considered when predefined recovery criteria are met. Multi-level procedures, sedation, cervical access, IDET or other thermal treatment, biologic or oxygen-ozone injection, technical difficulty, and patient-specific risk factors may justify structured observation for 6-8 hours or longer, including pain-trajectory documentation, neurologic reassessment, ambulation and urinary-function confirmation, and delayed-complication education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.