Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42683423›Full record

ReviewActa ortopedica brasileira2026

EVIDENCE-BASED REVIEWS & RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY: REVERSE ARTHROPLASTY FOR COMPLEX PROXIMAL HUMERAL FRACTURES IN ELDERLY PATIENTS.

Marcus Vinícius Galvão Amaral, Leonardo Zanesco, Gustavo de Mello Ribeiro Pinto, Maurício de Paiva Rafaelli, Thiago Barbosa Caixeta, Paulo Cesar Faiadi Piluski, Marcelo Costa de Oliveira Campos, Eduardo Angeli Malavolta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta ortopedica brasileira, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marcus Vinícius Galvão AmaralInstituto Nacional de Traumatologia e Ortopedia Jamil Haddad, Centro de Cirurgia do Ombro e Cotovelo, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7301-3644
Leonardo ZanescoUniversidade de Sao Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3554-7298
Gustavo de Mello Ribeiro PintoUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4079-3100
Maurício de Paiva RafaelliInstituto Naeon - Nucleo Avancado de Estudos em Ortopedia e Neurocirurgia, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9559-8636
Thiago Barbosa CaixetaUniversidade Federal de Goias, Goiania, Goias, GO, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8383-0733
Paulo Cesar Faiadi PiluskiHospital Sao Vicente de Paulo, Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1887-8861
Marcelo Costa de Oliveira CamposUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4498-2360
Eduardo Angeli MalavoltaUniversidade de Sao Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1956-6445

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Complex (Neer 3- or 4-part) proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients are associated with high complication and failure rates after open reduction and internal fixation with locking plates (ORIF-LP). Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has emerged as an alternative, but its comparative effectiveness remains debated. Methods: We conducted an evidence-based review of systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials including elderly patients with Neer 3- or 4-part fractures, identified through PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and BVS (search to August 2025). High-quality systematic reviews were prioritized, and individual RCTs were added when necessary. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using Cochrane methods and the GRADE approach. Results: Four systematic reviews and three RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Across network meta-analyses and direct comparisons, RSA provided superior shoulder function, with higher Constant and Oxford scores at 2 and 5 years than ORIF-LP. RSA also tended to reduce complication and reoperation rates, although event numbers were small and confidence intervals were wide. Overall certainty was low for function and very low for complications and reoperations. Conclusions: In elderly patients with complex proximal humeral fractures requiring surgery, RSA appears to yield better functional outcomes and fewer reoperations than ORIF-LP, supporting its use as the preferred surgical option, while acknowledging the low certainty of evidence.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, ShoulderFracture Fixation, InternalHumeral FracturesReverse Shoulder ArthroplastyTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID42683423
PMCPMC13532838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.