ReviewActa ortopedica brasileira2026
EVIDENCE-BASED REVIEWS & RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY: REVERSE ARTHROPLASTY FOR COMPLEX PROXIMAL HUMERAL FRACTURES IN ELDERLY PATIENTS.
Review in Acta ortopedica brasileira, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Complex (Neer 3- or 4-part) proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients are associated with high complication and failure rates after open reduction and internal fixation with locking plates (ORIF-LP). Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has emerged as an alternative, but its comparative effectiveness remains debated. Methods: We conducted an evidence-based review of systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials including elderly patients with Neer 3- or 4-part fractures, identified through PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and BVS (search to August 2025). High-quality systematic reviews were prioritized, and individual RCTs were added when necessary. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using Cochrane methods and the GRADE approach. Results: Four systematic reviews and three RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Across network meta-analyses and direct comparisons, RSA provided superior shoulder function, with higher Constant and Oxford scores at 2 and 5 years than ORIF-LP. RSA also tended to reduce complication and reoperation rates, although event numbers were small and confidence intervals were wide. Overall certainty was low for function and very low for complications and reoperations. Conclusions: In elderly patients with complex proximal humeral fractures requiring surgery, RSA appears to yield better functional outcomes and fewer reoperations than ORIF-LP, supporting its use as the preferred surgical option, while acknowledging the low certainty of evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.