ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Temporal Trends in Autologous Breast Reconstruction Among Patients With Psychiatric Diagnoses: From Disparity to Equity.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: During the last decades, advances in microsurgical techniques and equipment, alongside improvements in the perioperative care, have contributed to a steady rise in the use of autologous breast reconstruction (ABR). However, access to advanced reconstruction procedures has not been uniform across the patient population, exhibiting significant disparities related to race, ethnicity, comorbidity burden, insurance status, and socioeconomic status. Prior studies examining the relationship between psychiatric diagnoses and breast reconstruction have largely focused on short-term outcomes. The present study addresses this gap by leveraging the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network to examine 25-year temporal trends in the incidence of ABR among women with documented psychiatric diagnoses. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used TriNetX data (2000-2024) to evaluate temporal trends in ABR among women with and without preexisting psychiatric diagnoses. Incidence rates were analyzed across predefined periods using Poisson and negative binomial regression, reporting incidence rate ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Results: Among 6412 ABRs, 1877 occurred in women with psychiatric diagnoses, and 4535 in those without. Incidence rates rose from 33.5 to 895.1 per 100,000 person-years in psychiatric cohorts and from 108.1 to 700.9 in nonpsychiatric cohorts. Early incidence rate ratios favored nonpsychiatric patients, attenuating to near unity over time, with persistent lower rates observed in schizophrenia. Conclusions: Women with psychiatric diagnoses historically underwent ABR at significantly lower rates. These disparities progressively attenuated over the years, until reaching a near-equitable access to ABR irrespective of psychiatric status.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.