ArticleASM case reports2026
Emergence of
Article in ASM case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Case Summary: Two patients underwent preoperative nasal screening using Xpert SA Nasal Complete, and corresponding culture results were discordant with the molecular results. In both cases, the Xpert SA assay reported "SA detected and MRSA not detected," whereas culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) demonstrated the presence of MRSA. Additional testing supported the culture-based identification of MRSA. Whole-genome sequencing and molecular typing revealed that both MRSA isolates harbored Conclusion: While NAATs remain highly sensitive and reliable tools for MRSA screening and the overall risk of FN MRSA detection may be low, our cases highlight the importance of ongoing surveillance of local MRSA epidemiology and understanding the genetic inclusivity of the molecular assays used for detection. In high-risk or targeted patients, consideration of reflex culture may be warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.