ReviewActa ortopedica brasileira2026
EVIDENCE-BASED REVIEWS & RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY: LABRAL REPAIR FOR ANTERIOR SHOULDER INSTABILITY - MORE THAN TWO ANCHORS VERSUS UP TO TWO ANCHORS.
Review in Acta ortopedica brasileira, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Anterior shoulder instability is a common condition that mainly affects young adults. It is most often traumatic and is frequently associated with a Bankart lesion, characterized by detachment of the anteroinferior glenoid labrum. When conservative treatment fails, surgical repair is usually indicated. Biomechanical studies suggest that a greater number of anchors may increase the contact area and provide greater stability between the labrum and the glenoid, promoting a more stable reconstruction of the capsulolabral complex. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the Virtual Health Library (VHL) up to March 2026 to evaluate whether the use of more than two anchors is more effective than the use of up to two anchors for the arthroscopic treatment of anterior shoulder instability in adults. The certainty of the evidence was assessed with the GRADE approach. Results: One randomized controlled trial and two cohort studies were included. For function and complications, there was no evidence showing that the use of three or more anchors was more effective than the use of two anchors. For recurrence, there was evidence, although the certainty of the evidence was very low, that the use of three or more anchors was more effective than the use of up to two anchors. Conclusion: The surgeon should individually assess patient- and disease-related characteristics to make the best treatment decision. Regarding recurrence, the SBCOC Consensus Project suggests a preference for three or more anchors, given a trend toward a lower recurrence rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.