ArticleInternational medical case reports journal2026
Penetrating Cranio-Cerebral Gunshot Injury with Retained Intracranial Bullet Adjacent to the Superior Sagittal Sinus.
Article in International medical case reports journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Penetrating gunshot injuries to the head are among the most severe forms of traumatic brain injury and are associated with high morbidity and mortality. This case report describes a 40-year-old female who presented to the emergency department 2 hours after sustaining a penetrating cranio-cerebral gunshot injury. The patient experienced loss of consciousness at the time of injury. On admission, with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 10/15 and no focal neurological deficits. Vital signs were stable.Non-contrast head CT of the brain revealed a retained bullet in the parietal lobe without evidence of intracranial hemorrhage, mass effect, or midline shift, although image interpretation was limited by metallic artifact. The patient underwent an emergency craniotomy for removal of the retained intracranial bullet. Extreme caution was exercised to preserve the superior sagittal sinus and avoid vascular injury during the procedure. The surgery was completed without complications, and the patient was subsequently monitored in the intensive care unit). Follow-up CT imaging confirmed complete bullet removal and preservation of the superior sagittal sinus. Clinically, the patient showed neurological improvement, with her GCS increasing to 15/15. Conclusion: This case highlights the importance of early clinical stabilization, rapid neuroimaging, and timely neurosurgical intervention in improving outcomes following penetrating cranial gunshot injuries. Favorable neurological recovery can be achieved through surgical planning and timely intervention, even when a retained intracranial bullet is located in close proximity to critical neurovascular structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.